Red Green Color Blindness Simulator — Test & Fix Your Colors
Simulate red-green color blindness (protan/deutan) to spot accessibility issues. Use our simulator, test palettes, and learn fixes. Try the tool now.
READING INFO
Estimated Reading Time: 6 minutes
BLOG CONTENT
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Problem Context
- Solution Overview
- How to use Color Blindness Simulator — Step by Step
- Benefits & Examples
- Advanced Tips or Use Cases
- Conclusion
- FAQ
Introduction
If your site uses red/green signals — think error/success badges, charts, or forms — you’ll want to check them with a red green color blindness simulator right away. A simulator shows how people with protan (red) and deutan (green) deficiencies perceive your UI so you can fix confusing color combos before users complain. In this guide you’ll learn how to test, what to watch for, and practical fixes — plus one-click tools to preview and correct problem palettes. Try the simulator now: Color Blindness Simulator (WikipediaSearch) (opens in new tab).
(Primary keyword used in the first 100 words.)

Problem Context
Summary: Red-green color vision deficiencies are common and frequently break color-only cues on websites.
- What happens: People with protanopia/protanomaly (red deficiency) or deuteranopia/deuteranomaly (green deficiency) confuse reds, greens, browns, and some oranges, making UI signals ambiguous. nei.nih.gov+1
- How common is it: Roughly 8% of men and ~0.5% of women in populations of Northern European descent have inherited red-green CVD; prevalence varies by population and rises slightly with age. PubMed+1
Why it’s a problem for designers: Relying on color alone for critical information (status, form errors, chart distinctions) leads to accessibility failures and poor UX. WCAG says not to only use color to convey information — and contrast remains essential. Use simulators during design and testing to catch issues early. webaim.org+1

Solution Overview
Summary: Use a color blindness simulator to preview your pages, combine simulation with contrast checks, then apply accessible fixes (alternate cues, palette tweaks, labels).
Workflow at a glance:
- Simulate: Run pages or mockups through the Color Blindness Simulator (opens in new tab) or tools like Coblis to see protan & deutan views. color-blindness.com
- Contrast test: Use WebAIM’s Contrast Checker to ensure sufficient contrast ratios (WCAG 2.1 AA: 4.5:1 for normal text). webaim.org
- Fix & retest: Add shape/label cues, adjust hues or use accessible palettes (generate palettes with Random Color Palette Generator), then resimulate. (Internal tool links below.)
Bold callout: Simulation reveals where color fails — contrast checks show how badly. Use both.
How to use Color Blindness Simulator — Step by Step
Summary: A short, repeatable testing process you can use for single components or whole pages.

- Open the tool: Go to the Color Blindness Simulator (opens in new tab).
- Load an asset or page screenshot: Upload an image, paste a URL (if supported), or use the built-in sample. Tip: Start with your homepage or key flows (forms, dashboards, charts)
- Choose simulation mode: Select Protanopia, Protanomaly, Deuteranopia, and Deuteranomaly to test the main red/green types. The simulator toggles the image to show how colors shift. Colour Blind Awareness+1
- Scan for problem areas: Look for low-contrast text, indistinguishable chart series, or color-only buttons. Mark these in a bug list.
- Apply fixes: Try one or more of:
- Add icons or textual labels (✔ / ✖ / “Success” / “Error”).
- Change hue pairs (use the Random Color Palette Generator to find accessible combinations).
- Increase contrast (adjust lightness) and retest with WebAIM’s Contrast Checker. webaim.org+1
- Retest and document: Resimulate after changes; include screenshots in your accessibility report.

Screenshot placeholders:
- Screenshot A: Original UI screenshot (left) vs. Protanopia simulation (right).
- Screenshot B: Palette swap — before (red/green) vs after (magenta/green + icon labels).
CTA: Run a quick simulation on your main CTA and nav today — it’s fast and reveals hidden issues.
Benefits & Examples
Summary: Simulating red-green color blindness helps you ship accessible designs and avoid UX friction.
Benefits
- Catch critical failures early — avoid confusing purchase flows or misread charts.
- Improve inclusivity — accessible sites serve more users and reduce legal risk.
- Make design decisions objectively — simulations show exactly what a user sees, not what you think they see. nei.nih.gov+1
Real examples
- Traffic-like indicators: Replace red/green dots with icons + text labels (e.g., red dot + “Offline”).
- Charts: Add patterned fills or direct labels to lines/areas; don’t rely on color legend alone.
- Forms & validation: Use icons and inline text in addition to color borders.
Comparison table: Color-only vs color + cues
| Design | User with normal vision | Red-green CVD user |
|---|---|---|
| Error = red border only | Immediately visible | Often indistinguishable |
| Error = red border + ⚠ label | Immediately visible | Visible via label/icon |
| Chart series using red & green | Distinct | Often merges/confuses |
| Chart with shapes & labels | Distinct | Distinct (accessible) |
Trust signal / data: Red-green color vision deficiency is the most common CVD; testing and contrast checks are standard accessibility practice. PubMed+1
Secondary CTA: Generate an accessible palette with the Random Color Palette Generator (opens in new tab) and re-simulate.
Advanced Tips or Use Cases
Summary: Go beyond single screenshots—integrate simulation into your QA and design system.
- Automated tests: Include screenshots from critical pages into CI and run simulated checks to catch regressions. ArcGIS and other platforms document programmatic simulation approaches for maps and layouts. pro.arcgis.com
- Design tokens: When you extract color tokens for your design system, store alternate accessible tokens (high-contrast and colorblind-friendly variants).
- Use patterned fills & textures in charts: Useful for print and for users with combined low vision + CVD.
- Test edge cases: Older users may acquire CVD with age, so test with older palette and low-light scenarios. Recent research shows prevalence can increase with age and other ocular conditions. PubMed
Real-world use case: A data-viz product swapped 3 chart series from red/green/orange to a palette using teal/magenta/amber + dashed line styles and saw support tickets for misreading charts drop to near zero.
CTA: Add simulation to your checklist before every release.
Conclusion
Using a red-green color blindness simulator is a small step that pays off big: you’ll prevent miscommunication, improve inclusivity, and comply with accessibility best practices. Start by simulating your main pages, run WebAIM contrast checks, then update palettes and add non-color cues. Try the simulator now: Color Blindness Simulator (opens in new tab).
(Primary keyword used again in last 100 words.)
FAQ
Q1: What is the difference between protanopia and deuteranopia?
Protanopia is a red (L-cone) deficiency; deuteranopia is a green (M-cone) deficiency — both cause confusion between reds and greens. nei.nih.gov+1
Q2: How common is red-green color blindness?
About 8% of men and ~0.5–1% of women in Northern European populations; prevalence varies globally and increases modestly with age. PubMed+1
Q3: Can simulators perfectly recreate what a colorblind person sees?
Simulators approximate perception and are useful for spotting problem zones, but they are not a clinical diagnosis — always combine simulation with user testing when possible. color-blindness.com+1
Q4: What quick fixes work best?
Add labels/icons, increase contrast, choose colorblind-friendly palettes, and use patterns or shapes in charts. Also test with WCAG contrast tools. webaim.org
Q5: Which tools should I use alongside a simulator?
WebAIM Contrast Checker, Random Color Palette Generator (WikipediaSearch), and gradient/background preview tools (CSS Gradient Generator) — plus manual user testing. (Internal links below.) webaim.org+1
VISUAL ASSETS
Image Prompts (1200×628px each)
- Description: Side-by-side UI screenshot showing original site (left) and Protanopia simulation (right).
Size: 1200×628px
Composition: Browser window centered; left labeled “Original”, right labeled “Protanopia (simulated)”; red/green elements highlighted.
Alt text: “red green color blindness simulator original vs protanopia simulation” - Description: Designer testing a chart; one chart uses red/green, the other uses colorblind-friendly palette + patterns.
Size: 1200×628px
Composition: Two charts side by side with callouts describing fixes (labels, patterns).
Alt text: “chart colorblind friendly palette with patterns” - Description: Accessibility QA checklist on a laptop with the simulator tool open and WebAIM Contrast Checker on a second screen.
Size: 1200×628px
Composition: Workspace with two monitors; checklist visible in foreground.
Alt text: “accessibility checklist using color blindness simulator and contrast checker” - Description: Abstract visual of color cones with labels L-cone (red), M-cone (green), S-cone (blue) to explain protan/deutan differences.
Size: 1200×628px
Composition: Stylized retina diagram with labeled cones and short captions.
Alt text: “retina cones explanation protan deutan tritan color blindness”
VIDEO CONTENT
Rationale: Video demos quickly build intuition for how color vision deficiencies appear and how to use simulation tools.
Embed 1 — Protanopia simulation (visual demo):
Rationale: High-resolution visual demo that shows how typical images change under protanopia.
Embed 2 — How to Simulate Color Blindness (tutorial):
Rationale: Practical walkthrough showing tools and simulation steps useful for designers.
INTERNAL LINKING MAP (all open in new tab)
- Primary tool: Color Blindness Simulator — WikipediaSearch (opens in new tab)
- Related tool (palettes): Random Color Palette Generator — WikipediaSearch (opens in new tab)
- Related tool (gradients/backgrounds): CSS Gradient Generator — WikipediaSearch (opens in new tab)
- Blog category: https://wikipediasearch.com/blog/ (opens in new tab)
EXTERNAL AUTHORITATIVE LINKS & CITATIONS (used above)
- National Eye Institute — Types of Color Vision Deficiency. nei.nih.gov
- Colour Blind Awareness — Types of Colour Blindness. Colour Blind Awareness
- PubMed review on prevalence of red-green deficiency. PubMed
- WebAIM — Contrast guidance and tools. webaim.org
- Coblis / Color-Blindness.com — Color blindness simulator reference. color-blindness.com
(Citations placed inline in the article where relevant.)
SCHEMA MARKUP
FAQ Schema (JSON-LD):
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is a red-green color blindness simulator?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "A simulator approximates how images and UI elements appear to people with red-green color vision deficiencies (protan and deutan types), helping designers spot accessibility problems."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How do I test my website for red-green color blindness?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Use a simulator to preview screenshots, run contrast checks (e.g., WebAIM Contrast Checker), and add non-color cues (labels, icons) where needed."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Are simulators accurate?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Simulators provide useful approximations for design testing but are not clinical diagnostics. Combine simulation with real-user testing when possible."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Which colors are safest to use?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "High-contrast color pairs and palettes designed for color-blind users (or using pattern/shape cues) are safest. Also test with contrast tools and simulators."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Where can I find resources for testing?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Use WikipediaSearch's Color Blindness Simulator, WebAIM Contrast Checker, and tools like Coblis or Random Color Palette Generator to build and test accessible palettes."
}
}
]
}
Article Schema (JSON-LD):
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "Red-Green Color Blindness Simulator — Test & Fix Your Colors",
"description": "Simulate red-green color blindness (protan/deutan) to spot accessibility issues. Use our simulator, test palettes, and learn fixes to make your UI inclusive.",
"author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "WikipediaSearch Editorial" },
"publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "WikipediaSearch", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://wikipediasearch.com/logo.png" } },
"datePublished": "2025-10-22",
"mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://wikipediasearch.com/blog/red-green-color-blindness-simulator" }
}